Legal Opinion
Hixson v. Ward
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 14, 1929No. Gen. No. 7,875PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jett
This is a replevin suit instituted by Hixson, defendant in error, in the circuit court of Winnebago county, against Ward, plaintiff in error. The following facts are stipulated:
Tom Calderotta owned an automobile. T. H. Hehir desired to purchase it. They entered into a conditional sales contract to which was attached, by perforation, a promissory note. The contract and note are, by stipulation, admitted in evidence.
Calderotta sold the contract and note to Hixson. They were dated August 24, 1926.
On September 13,1926, and after Hixson, had bought the papers, Hehir paid to Calderotta the balance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sherer-Gillett Co. v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- King v. ThissellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Federal Trust Co. v. Bristol County Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Graver Bartlett Nash Co. v. KransAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Hunter v. CrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meisel Tire Co. v. Edwards Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- In Re E. Spire Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- In re Hillebrand Metal Works, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984