Legal Opinion

In re Hillebrand Metal Works, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 23, 1984No. Bankruptcy Nos. 83 B 12245, 83 B 12246Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FREDERICK J. HERTZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

This proceeding arises from a motion of U.I.P. Engineered Products Corporation (“UIP”) for relief from the Section 362 automatic stay. 11 U.S.C. § 362 (Supp. V 1981). C.T.R., Inc. (“CTR”) as debtor-in-possession, LaSalle National Bank, as trustee of certain premises, and A.P. Machine and Development, Ltd. object to UIP’s motion. The issue before this court is whether UIP has an interest in the property in issue (cranes) sufficient to warrant relief from the stay.

II

CTR was the subtenant of UIP of certain premises owned by LaSalle National…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harney v. SpellmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. Household Finance Corp. v. MowdyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Mayor's Jewelers of Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. v. LevinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Hixson v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API