Legal Opinion

In re Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It is apparent that the appeal is premature. The question of the custody of the child has not been considered or determined. The order is interlocutory and no substantial right of the appellant has been affected. G.S. 1-271. DeBruhl v. Highway Com., 241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200.

Appeal dismissed.

WiNBORXE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by DeviN, Emergency Justice, while he was serving in place of Winborne, J., who was absent on account of his physical condition. It is now adopted by the Court and ordered filed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Bruhl v. State Highway and Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleishel v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956