Carlock v. Emery
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. An order sustaining a demurrer to a motion made pursuant to Code § 9-604 to require counsel to produce, prove and show the authority under which he appears in the cause and to disclose the name of the party or parties who employed him and the name of the real party at interest is not a final judgment that may be reviewed by bill of exceptions to this court. Code § 6-701, as amended; Grier v. Grier, 100 Ga. App. 322 (111 SE2d 256); Medernach v. Bazemore, 100 Ga. App. 721 (112 SE2d 272); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (48 SE 128). Such an order makes no final disposition of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Felker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Chemetron Corp. v. Southern Nitrogen Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Willis v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Southern Railway Co. v. Floyd CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.