In the Interest of M.J.H.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

M.J.H. appeals from his adjudication of delinquency and commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We reverse.

As the state relied entirely upon circumstantial evidence, it was incumbent upon it to present evidence inconsistent with any and all reasonable hypotheses of innocence. G.H. v. State, 599 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Instead, the state’s only evidence against M.J.H. was that he was present at the scene of the commission of the crime and that he fled therefrom upon discovery. At most, the state’s witness could only testify that he observed…