Legal Opinion

G.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1992No. 91-1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

G.H. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency for criminal mischief. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Witnesses observed G.H. running around a parked van and then running from the parking lot. The van had been deeply scratched; no witness had seen G.H. inflict the damage. There was testimony that G.H. and the family who owned the van had “bad blood” between them.

“Where the only proof of guilt is circumstantial, no matter how strongly the evidence may suggest guilt a conviction may not be sustained unless the evidence is inconsistent with any hypothesis of innocence.” McArthur v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. J. O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. D. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. E.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. F.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. In the Interest of M.J.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Everly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. JR v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API