Legal Opinion

Hatter v. Quina

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1927No. 1 Div. 434PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The purpose of the bill by the heirs of Ellen ICing Quina was to settle and determine their title in reversion to real property in the city of Mobile. Several and separate demurrers to the bill were overruled.

Ellen King Quina had owned the property in her lifetime. The averment, briefly stated, is that she executed a mortgage of her property to defendant Ladd, who was acting as agent of the Bank of Mobile, to secure the debt of her husband, and that Ladd aixd the bank have conveyed the property to the defendant Hatter. Afterwards, in lieu of foreclosure, Ellen King.Quina was induced to make…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Lansden v. BoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Hooper v. StrahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. St. Clair Springs Hotel Co. v. BalcombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reeder v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Teal v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Mount Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API