United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Forrester
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentEberhardt, Presiding Judge
"In determining whether or not the relationship of master and servant prevails in a compensation case, the same principles that exist under the common law obtain ... As stated in 18 RCL 784, §244: 'The fact that an employee is the general servant of one employer does not, as a matter of law, prevent him from becoming the particular servant of another, who may become liable for his acts. And it is true as a general proposition that when one person lends his servant to another for a particular employment, the servant, for anything done in that particular employment, must be dealt with as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Fulghum Industries, Inc. v. Pollard Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Merry Bros. Brick & Tile Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Greenberg & Bond Co. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.