Legal Opinion

Hinton & Walker v. Pearson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1926No. 25446PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellants, Hinton & Walker, brought this action against appellee, Lamar Pearson, in the circuit court of Lamar county, to recover an indebtedness alleged to be due appellants by appellee for the services of the former in hauling a lot of lumber from appellee’s sawmill to the railroad at Purvis for shipment, and to establish and enforce a lien on such lumber for the payment of such indebtedness under chapter 131 of the Laws of 1908 (Hemingway’s Code, sections 2415-2417, inclusive). At the conclusion of the testimony, all appellants’ evidence offered for the purpose of establishing a lien…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Moore v. HeaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  4. Heard v. CrumMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Williams v. Alcorn Electric Light Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. APAC-Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McDonald v. Hall-Neely Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McDonald v. Hall-Neely Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Mississippi Department of Employment Security v. Dover Trucking, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Richardson v. APAC-Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API