Moore v. Heaney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. Attachment on judgment issued at the instance of the appellee and laid in the hands of the appellants, and Chas. Moore, trading under the name and style of Robert Moore & Brother, as garnishees. The facts of the case, and the rulings Of the court below, (Marshall, J.,) are sufficiently stated in the opinion of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtEccleston, J.
John Heany, the appellee, who was plaintiff below, obtained a judgment in the Court of Common Pleas for the City of Baltimore, at September term 1854, against Benjamin W. Quinlan. Upon this judgment an attachment was issued on the 4th of March 1856, and on the 17th of the same month was laid in the hands of “ Robert Moore, Charles Moore and Samuel Moore, trading under the name and style of Robert Moore and Brothers, as appears by .the Sheriff’s return. At September term 1856, the three Moores appeared and jointly pleaded nulla bona, upon which issue was taken.
The plaintiff filed…
2Cited by17 opinions
- American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Shriver v. Carlin & Fulton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Bendix Radio Corp. v. HoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Hettleman v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.