Ruckel v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, District Judge.
Pending is Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company’s (“Sears”) motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS the motion.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Ruckel suffers from cerebral palsy, a condition that slows his speech and actions slightly. The condition also causes him to have strabismus or “crossed eyes.” Other than his slight slowness in some actions and his crossed eyes, however, Ruckel admits his condition has not otherwise adversely impacted his life. His condition neither requires medical care nor medication. He also does not participate in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Shepherdstown Volunteer Fire Dept. v. State Ex Rel. State Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Barefoot v. Sundale Nursing HomeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonald v. Altice Technical Services US Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Mull v. GriffithDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019