Legal Opinion
In Re Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 2001No. MDL 1283, M-21-79 RCC, 99 CIV 962 RCCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought the above-captioned litigation against five national stock exchanges and various other defendants alleging violations of the antitrust laws with respect to the listing and trading of equity options. By Opinion and Order dated February 14, 2001 (the “Summary Judgment Order”), this Court granted summary judgment to defendants and dismissed the action, stating:
This Court has no jurisdiction to determine whether [plaintiffs’] allegations have any substantive merit. Because the listing and trading of options classes falls within the purview…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spencer v. CasavillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Miller v. American Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003