Legal Opinion

Miller v. American Stock Exchange, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 9, 2003No. Docket Nos. 01-7371, 01-7580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in these class action suits, which were consolidated for pretrial purposes in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, appeal from a judgment of that court, Richard Conway Casey, Judge, dismissing their claims that the conduct of defendants American Stock Exchange, Inc. (“AMEX”), et al., in restricting stock-exchange listings of certain securities for options trading violated § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2000) (“Sherman Act”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, ruling that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. SpitzerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Chubb v. KeckDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API