Legal Opinion
James Harold Peterson and Paula Peterson v. City of Plymouth, Minnesota Michael Ridgley David Lindman Mark Bevins Steven Scollard and Scott Kluck
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1991No. 90-5476PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
James and Paula Peterson brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of their rights under the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as a variety of state law actions 1 against the City of Plymouth, three Plymouth police officers, and two other non-municipal defendants. In two separate orders, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Plymouth and the police officers on all of the Peter-sons’ claims except for one, which the court simply dismissed without prejudice. The court later dismissed without prejudice the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kelly v. Borough of CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Cole v. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- James Harold Peterson Paula Peterson v. City of Plymouth Michael Ridgley David Lindman Mark BevinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Cole v. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.