Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Lands Located in Raritan & Woodbridge
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 30, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 8788PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
This condemnation proceeding was instituted in 1946 by the Federal Government. The subject of the condemnation was a portion of a County gravel-surfaced road in Middlesex County, New Jersey.
A jury trial was had and the jury returned a verdict for Middlesex County in the amount of $172,000. The Government now moves, pursuant to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 50, 28 U.S.C., to set aside the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict and to have judgment entered in accordance with a motion for a directed verdict made by the Government at the close of all of the evidence. In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. 51.8 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
- United States v. 811.92 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Certain Lands Located in the Raritan & WoodbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Raritan ArsenalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.