Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United of Omaha Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-02344-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM G. YOUNG1, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Beverly Bailey (“Bailey”) brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, against United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (“United of Omaha”) for denying her application for long-term disability benefits. She seeks recovery of those benefits.
Bailey, a former legal assistant, began experiencing severe back pain in August 2009. Her pain, which had been increasing in severity for over a year, caused her to leave her job on November 5, 2009. After months of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sullivan v. The Nissan Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan IIDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Withers v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021