Butler v. Weisler
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The question presented is whether defendants are entitled to relief from the orders of the Assistant Clerk which directed and later confirmed the sale of the real property in which defendants own a one-third undivided interest. A proper solution of this question requires that we first determine the substantive rights, vis-a-vis each other, of parties owning interests in real property as tenants in common.
“A tenant in common is entitled, as a matter of right, to a partition of the land to the end that he may have and enjoy his share therein in severalty, unless it is made to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Brown v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Carolina Mineral Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Hale v. ThackerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- LYONS-HART v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010