Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Indiana School for the Blind
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 1995No. 93A02-9501-EX-20PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Darrell R. Hancock contests the award of the full Workers' Compensation Board claiming that the Board erroneously found that he only has a 25% permanent partial impairment of his entire body.
*343FACTS
Hancock is an employee of appellee-defen-dant Indiana School for the Blind (ISB). Hancock worked as a shift operator in the boiler room of ISB. On April 16, 1991, Hancock sustained injuries when he tripped and fell at work.
As a result of his accident, Hancock filed an application for an adjustment of claim with the Indiana Workers' Compensation Board on March…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gorby v. McEndarferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Wilson v. BETZ CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
- Whaley v. STEUBEN CTY. RURAL EL. MEMB. CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Indiana Bank & Trust Co. v. Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. FeltisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graycor Industrial v. MetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- KNK Group, Humphreys Construction, C'ville Steel Roofs, and Mitchell Humphreys v. Doug Sarver (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020