Legal Opinion

Daniel Imperato v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 9, 2018No. 7896-14Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2018-126

UNITED STATES TAX COURT DANIEL IMPERATO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 7896-14. Filed August 9, 2018. Daniel Imperato, pro se. Kimberly A. Daigle and John T. Arthur, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION GOEKE, Judge: Respondent determined income tax deficiencies of $9,714, $6,597, and $1,555, a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty of $1,835, $1,319, and $311, and a section 6651(a)(1) failure to file addition to tax of $985, $622, -2- [*2] and $311 for 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.1 The issues for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  5. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API