Hobbs v. . Cashwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Peebles, J., at May Term, 1911, of SampsoN. This case was before tbis Court at a previous term, and is reported in 152 N. C., page 183. The case was retried at May Term, 1911, of the Superior Court of Sampson County. There was a verdict upon the issues and a judgment for the plaintiffs, from which the defendants appealed.
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs move, under Eule 20 of the Supreme Court, to dismiss this appeal upon the grounds that in the record the “proceedings are not set forth in the order of time in which they occurred, and so as to follow each other in the order in which same took place, as required by Eule 19, section 1.”
2. For that the appellant has not set out in the case on appeal his exceptions, briefly and clearly stated and numbered, as prescribed by Eules 27 and 19, section 2. Jones v. R. R., 153 N. C., 419; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 452.
Upon examination of the record in this case, we are of opinion that under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. Wall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Jones v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wheeler v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Carter v. . ReavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Sanders v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931