Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. . Cole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Adams, J., at March Term, 1913, of BtjNcombe.

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, appellees, moved in this Court to dismiss tbe appeal or to affirm tbe judgment, because tbe errors alleged by tbe appellants were not properly assigned in tbe case on appeal and in accordance with tbe well settled rule of tbis Court. Tbe proper motion is to affirm, as we are required to-examine tbe record, even if no errors are assigned in tbe case on appeal or there is no case on appeal at all. But plaintiff has. submitted bis motion in tbe alternative, which is usual, and it is sufficient in form. Upon examination of tbe record, we find there are fifteen exceptions, and nine of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Marable v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Lee v. . BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Aman v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Will of BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Haddock v. StocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ector v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Ector v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API