Smith v. Crucible Steel Casting Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Mil--waukee county: Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge. This action was brought by the plaintiff for an accounting and to recover commissions claimed to be due him upon contract.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Mil--waukee county: Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge. This action was brought by the plaintiff for an accounting and to recover commissions claimed to be due him upon contract. The complaint alleges, in substance, that defendant was a corporation engaged in manufacturing steel castings, and that the Four Wheel Drive Auto Company, hereinafter called the Auto Company, was a corporation engaged in the manufacture of auto trucks and was using and likely to use in the future a large amount of steel castings; that about June 8/1915, defendant agreed with…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed'July 17, 1920:
Siebecker, J.
The trial court adopted the advisory verdict of the jury as the correct finding upon the issues of fact it embraced. The verdict found, in effect, (1) that it was agreed between the plaintiff and the defendant on or before June 8, 1915, that plaintiff was to receive a commission from defendant on all castings defendant made for the Auto Company off of patterns of the Auto Company; (2) that the commission to be paid was to be the balance remaining after deducting six and one-half cents per pound, plus freight charge to Clintonville,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Marinette, Tomahawk & Western Railroad v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Kirkpatrick v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Hamill v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Logemann v. LogemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944