Legal Opinion

Logemann v. Logemann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

It appears to be established that appellants acquired a business which had belonged to one of the respondents ; that in the securing and reorganizing of that business they agreed that in consideration of certain assistance offered by a brother of one of the respondents, to give the respondent, Otto Logemann, a substantial interest in the reorganized business. There was a failure to perform on the part of the appellants and, because of this, these respondents began a suit in equity seeking to compel the appellants to carry out that agreement. When that suit was reached for trial á series of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Levis v. Black River Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Smith v. Crucible Steel Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Giglio v. KraemerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  4. Dyson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kocinski v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Adelmeyer v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. American Casualty Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Kocinski v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API