Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanchez-Milam

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-21190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Victor Sanchez-Milam (“Sanchez”), appeals his conviction for illegally reentering the United States after deportation without the express consent of the Attorney General to reapply for admission. Because we find that the district court was presented with substantial evidence supporting Sanchez’s conviction, we affirm.

I

Sanchez was charged in a one-count indictment with being an alien unlawfully present in the United States following deportation after having been convicted of a felony without having “obtained the consent of the Attorney General of the United States for reapplication…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. AsiborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Trevino-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Juan JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Francisco Mateo-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Richard D. MathesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Roberto Cervantes-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Rueda-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Lucio Pina-Jaime, AKA Lucio Pina Jaime AKA Lucio Jaime PinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Ramos-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Fajardo-FajardoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API