Legal Opinion

Matter of Mintz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 27, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney ethics proceeding was initiated by a complaint filed with the District Ethics Committee. Respondent, Donald H. Mintz, was charged with discussing with a client the possibility of killing another individual. Respondent was also separately charged with discussing with this client the making of a false claim of physical inability to stand trial on pending charges. An additional charge accused respondent of stating that he could arrange for the sale of cocaine. The final charge alleged that respondent also advised his client how to jump bail and avoid detection.

The District Ethics…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. In Re MirabelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. In Re GenserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. In re SchleimerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of LunettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Matter of EdsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. In Re RosenfeldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Matter of VincentiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API