Legal Opinion

Moses v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1982No. B14-81-440-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

Upon motion for rehearing appellant accepts the disposition of grounds one and three in our original opinion. Appellant presents no new argument for ground two and his motion on that point is denied. 630 S.W.2d 337, Tex.App.

Appellant has sufficiently narrowed her argument in ground four and we feel compelled to address her specific contention upon rehearing. Appellant correctly argues that Red Bluff abstained from passing upon the merits of Section 43.23(e) and (f) Tex. Penal Code Ann. (Vernon Supp.1982). Specifically, the court in Red Bluff held

th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Parent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. Hoyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Tyree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API