Legal Opinion
Tyson v. Willauer
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 23, 2003No. 3:01 CV 01917 GLGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Defendants Jeffrey W. Rasey, Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and Sergeant Matthew Willauer of the Bloomfield Police Department 1 have moved for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity [Doc. # 74] . 2 The only remaining count against these Defendants is brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), 3 for their alleged violation of Plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights in connection with their execution of an arrest…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- El Bey v. RoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Adams v. SpringmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- DeMayo v. NugentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Berrios v. HatwoodDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- El Bey v. RoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.