State v. Kaler
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Defendants, James Farrar and Robert Kaler were convicted by jury verdicts in a joint trial held in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Bradford J.). Farrar appeals from his conviction as an accomplice to aggravated assault pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 57(3)(A) 1 and 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983). 2 Kaler appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983) and reckless conduct with a firearm pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 211 (1983). 3 Defendant Farrar argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction as an accomplice.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. LagasseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CheneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. GauthierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. CoburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- State v. FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.