Legal Opinion

State v. Kaler

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 4, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Defendants, James Farrar and Robert Kaler were convicted by jury verdicts in a joint trial held in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Bradford J.). Farrar appeals from his conviction as an accomplice to aggravated assault pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 57(3)(A) 1 and 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983). 2 Kaler appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983) and reckless conduct with a firearm pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 211 (1983). 3 Defendant Farrar argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction as an accomplice.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. LagasseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CheneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. State v. GauthierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. State v. CoburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. State v. FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API