Legal Opinion

Kodak Mining Co. v. Carrs Fork Corp.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1984PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT

The issue presented by this motion for interlocutory relief pursuant to CR 65.09 is whether the trial court was correct in refusing to stay its proceedings pending arbitration between the parties pursuant to clauses in the controlling contracts, two coal mining leases, which required arbitration of disputes.

In 1956 Kodak Mining Company, the lessee, and Carrs Pork Corporation, the lessor, entered into two coal mining leases. Both of the leases contained a broad arbitration clause. The clause in the March 31, 1956 lease states:

If at any time, at termination of this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  3. Fite & Warmath Const. Co., Inc. v. Mys Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mills v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. RBF Management Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Michael Schnuerle v. Insight Communications Company, L.P.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Louisville Peterbilt, Inc. v. CoxKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Louisa v. NewlandKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  5. North Fork Collieries, LLC v. HallKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API