Cary v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Richard Cary, et al., (“landowners”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims denying their claims against the United States for the taking of their property without just compensation by inverse condemnation in the 2003 California “Cedar Fire.” Cary v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 145 (2007). Because the landowners have not stated a claim for which relief may be granted, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The landowners are aggrieved owners of properties neighboring the Cleveland National Forest (“CNF”), near San Diego, California. On October 25, 2003, a deer hunter…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Thales Visionix Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.