Legal Opinion

Cary v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 16, 2009No. 2008-5022PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Richard Cary, et al., (“landowners”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims denying their claims against the United States for the taking of their property without just compensation by inverse condemnation in the 2003 California “Cedar Fire.” Cary v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 145 (2007). Because the landowners have not stated a claim for which relief may be granted, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The landowners are aggrieved owners of properties neighboring the Cleveland National Forest (“CNF”), near San Diego, California. On October 25, 2003, a deer hunter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Thales Visionix Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Bussie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API