Legal Opinion
Walter Frank Knowles Alias John Frank Smith v. Dale Carson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1969No. 27881_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
We have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the cause on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Rule 18 of the Rules of the Court, Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir.1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I, and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Walter F. Knowles appeals from an order dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. The complaint alleges a civil conspiracy under the Civil Rights Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jim Beard and Hubbard Beard v. Melvin StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Aileen Henig, a Minor Together With Ludwig Henig and Geneva M. Henig, Her Parents v. Rocco A. OdoriosoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Gaito v. StraussDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jones v. BalesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Calvin INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN ROBERT CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Phillip C. Shaw v. Marvin McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Francis J. Savage v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.