State v. Taylor
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
This is another Sixth Amendment speedy trial case. The central question presented is whether a defendant permanently waives his constitutional right to a speedy trial because his attorney moves for a trial setting to be vacated due to a scheduling conflict with another trial setting and stipulates that the resulting delay will not be attributable to the State. The district court concluded, “it is not reasonable to say that this ‘waiver’ would allow a one (1) year, three (3) months and six (6) days delay” and dismissed the criminal information with prejudice on grounds that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.