Legal Opinion · Dissent

Law Offices of Clark v. Altman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1984No. 6501Published

1DissentBurke, Chief Justice

I dissent.

In April 1979, Murphy Clark, an attorney, provided legal services to the defendant, David Altman, also an attorney. When Altman refused to pay for the services, Clark sued to recover the money owed. Despite proper service, Altman failed to appear in or respond to the lawsuit, and default judgment was entered against him in the amount of $5,799.70.

On March 18, 1980, the court ordered that a bond posted by Altman be turned over to Clark. This left $388.13 still owing under the default judgment order. To satisfy this debt, Clark caused real property owned by Altman to be sold at an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Nichols v. EckertAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Peter W. Colm and John M. McIntyre v. Cyrus R. Vance, Secretary of State, U. S. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API