Wimmer v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} Kurt Wimmer and the Wimmer Family Trust (“the Wimmers”) argue that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio erred in allowing Ohio Edison Company to remove certain trees from a transmission-line easement running over the Wimmers’ property. We disagree and affirm the order of the commission.
I. Background
{¶ 2} Ohio Edison owned a transmission-line easement running over the Wimmers’ property. For years, Ohio Edison, in accordance with the company’s general policy, had trimmed and (rarely) removed trees growing in the easement. But that policy changed after several tree-to-line contacts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Corrigan v. Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Smith v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Wimmer Family Trust v. FirstEnergy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corrigan v. Illum. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Berry v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016