Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided March 30, 2021No. 4:17-cv-00039Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION CHAZ PINKSTON PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:17-CV-39-DMB-DAS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After a long and winding procedural history in this case, this Court held a four-day evidentiary hearing1 on Chaz Pinkston’s only remaining claim—a due process forcible medication claim against Dr. Hendrick Kuiper. Because Pinkston was not a danger to himself, others, or property at the time Kuiper directed that Pinkston be forcibly injected with medication, the Court finds Kuiper…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API