Legal Opinion

Alonzo v. Homeland Stores, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1993No. 81440PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

In this review proceeding, Winifred Luanne Alonzo argues the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in calculating a temporary total disability overpayment credit based on a dollar amount rather than the number of weeks awarded, citing Humpty Dumpty v. Moorehead, 569 P.2d 998 (Okla.1977) and Chamberlain v. American Airlines, 740 P.2d 717 (Okla.1987).

In Chamberlain, the Oklahoma Supreme Court examined the credit of mandatory payments under 85 O.S.Supp.1974 § 22 against permanent total disability benefits in light of the prohibition on certain types of credits under 85…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. American AirlinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Wetz v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Humpty Dumpty v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Loffland Brothers Co. of Venezuela v. HammanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ametek, Inc. v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Ametek, Inc. v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API