Armstrong v. Boyce
Watertown City Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James C. Harberson, Jr., J.
The three cases involved in this decision present an opportunity to outline two laws in New York which afford the purchaser of a used car protection from defects in the vehicle upon delivery and for a reasonable period subsequent to delivery of the automobile for certain key parts of the vehicle.
This decision must involve section 417 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of New York and section 198-b of the General Business Law. An examination of each statute to ascertain how it differs from and how it complements the other law, helps clarify the duty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carmine v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Natale v. Martin Volkswagen, Inc.Utica City Court · 1978
- Pierce v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Rayhn v. Martin Nemer Volkswagen Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Pinelli v. De Paula Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. Planet Motor Car, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001
- Barilla v. Gunn Buick-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Oswego City Court · 1988
- Ireland v. J.L.'s Auto Sales, Inc.Arcadia Justice Court · 1991