Legal Opinion
Santorso v. Bristol Hospital
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 2011No. AC 32136PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendants, Bristol Hospital (hospital) and physicians Jeffrey Goldberg and Rainer Bagdas-arian, appeal from the denial of their motions for summary judgment 1 in this medical malpractice action. They claim that the trial court, Hon. Joseph M. ShortaU, judge trial referee, improperly denied their motions for summary judgment rejecting their claim that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On June 1, 2006, Lawrence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Himmelstein v. BernardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Barton v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Santorso v. Bristol HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011