Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Vache

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 20, 1933No. 13,272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are husband and wife and are hereinafter sometimes referred to as Lewis and Mrs. Lewis respectively. Defendant in error is referred to as Vache.

Vache had judgment against plaintiffs in error, in their absence, on stipulation of counsel. They moved to vacate on the ground that their attorney compromised the suit without their consent and in direct violation of their instructions. That motion was denied and to review that ruling they prosecute this writ and ask that it be made a supersedeas. Both parties ask final judgment on this application.

Vache had fee title to five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hallack v. LoftSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coon v. GinsbergColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Radosevich v. PeguesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  3. Galbraith v. Monarch Gold Dredging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cross v. Dist. Court in & for 1st Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Cross v. District Court ex rel. First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API