Legal Opinion

State v. Hoverson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2006No. 20050237PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Danny Hoverson appeals from an amended judgment of conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm, concluding: (1) the district court did not err in denying Hoverson’s motion to dismiss based upon his claim o.f outrageous government conduct; (2) the court interpreted the law too narrowly when it refused to allow Hoverson to cross examine a witness on the underlying facts of a prior conviction, but the error was harmless; (3) the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow Hoverson to cross examine a witness on specific instances of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. OrrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Internal Energy Management Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. State v. HenesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United States v. McConnelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API