Legal Opinion
Barton v. City of Bristol
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 14, 2009No. SC 17953PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The plaintiff, Peter Barton, brought this action against the defendants, the city of Bristol (city), John DiVenere, the city’s chief of police, and AFSCME, Council 15, Local 754, AFL-CIO (union), alleging that the city and DiVenere had violated General Statutes § 7-294aa (a) 1 by refusing to restore the plaintiff to his position on the Bristol police department after he had resigned from his employment in order to serve temporarily in peacekeeping operations in the country of Iraq. The plaintiff further alleged that the union had made negligent representations to him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kramer v. PetisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Lydall, Inc. v. RuschmeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Garcia v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Director of Health Affairs Policy Planning v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Aqleh v. Cadlerock Joint Venture II, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- DAIMLERCHRYSLER INS. CO., LLC v. PambianchiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. AmaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.