Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Chicago Transit Authority Hardship Committee
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 25, 2003No. 1-02-0210 RelPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE McBRIDE
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Brian G. Nichols, a Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) employee, requested a withdrawal of his funds from the CTA Employees’ Deferred Compensation Plan (Plan). Nichols’ applications were denied by the committee (Committee) that administers the Plan and he appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court found that the Committee did not abuse its discretion in denying Nichols’ request for funds. Nichols appeals to this court, pro se, contending that the Committee erred in failing to acknowledge his status as an eligible…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Diane M. Cutting and Warren L. Cutting v. Jerome Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gatto v. St. Richard School, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shorter v. LeachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Quinn v. Non-Contributory National Long Term Disability ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cepero v. Illinois State Board of InvestmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Nichols v. Chicago Transit Authority Hardship CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004