Legal Opinion

VARELA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1970No. 2020PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2020 MATTER OF VARELA In Visa Petition Proceedings A-19184691 Decided by Board February 6, 1970 Visa petition to accord beneficiary immediate relative status was properly denied since upon the death of the United States citizen petitioner, benefi- ciary was no longer the spouse of a citizen and, hence, not entitled to sta- tus as an immediate relative. ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: Esther M. Kaufman, Esquire Irving A. Appleman Room 102 Appellate Trial Attorney 1823 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Norman Stiller, Esquire 995 Market Street, Suite 1018…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Angela Maria Pierno v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Mrs. Kuniko Haraguchi Wright v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Scalzo v. HurneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hom Sin v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Aquelino Jose Pacheco Pereira v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Neang Chea Taing v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Carla Freeman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Nelly Lockhart v. Janet NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. SANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  5. Robinson v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API