Legal Opinion

SANO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1985No. ID 2999PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2999 MATTER OF SANO In Visa Petition Proceedings A-23114185 Decided by Board October 29, 1985 (1) An appeal from the denial or revocation of a visa petition may be filed only by the petitioner. (2) Since the appellate jurisdiction of the Board of Immigration Appeals is defined by the regulations set forth in

8 C.F.R. § 3.1(b) (1985), the Board has no jurisdic- tion over a particular matter unless it has been affirmatively granted by the regu- lations. (3) Under

8 C.F.R. § 3.1

(bX5) (1985), the Board's authority to review decisions on visa petitions is limited to that accorded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Joseph v. LandonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Mrs. Kuniko Haraguchi Wright v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Scalzo v. HurneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. VARELABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
  5. Hom Sin v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bangura v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Mantena v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Bangura v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Neang Chea Taing v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Carla Freeman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API