Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 8226SC1349PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

HH

We are asked to decide whether the trial court erred in affirming the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission’s interpretation of the procedural provisions of the Charlotte Zoning Ordinance, to prohibit a landowner from filing a second petition to amend the zoning classification within two years from a denial of the first petition. We affirm.

II

On 25 January 1982, plaintiff, Lillie C. Clark, owner of a 2.38 acre tract zoned R-9MF (multi-family residential district) first filed a petition with the Commission to lower the zoning classification to B-D(CD)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. George v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Tyrie v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Stephens v. Montgomery County Council & WillcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Fairway Outdoor Advertising v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Rowe v. Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Waterway Drive Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of Cedar PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API