Legal Opinion

Fortin v. City of Gardner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Fortin brings this action to recover for injuries resulting from a fall on Main Street in Gardner on *437February 1, 1961. The city claimed an exception to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict. After a verdict for Fortin, the trial judge reported the case, expressing uncertainty whether “an actionable defect existed . . . and . . . whether . . . [Fortin] was, as a matter of law,” guilty of contributory negligence. The evidence is stated in its aspect most favorable to Fortin.

Fortin was sixty-seven years old at the time of the accident. He was employed in Gardner. On the day of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Street v. Inhabitants of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Johnson v. Town of OrangeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Scholl v. New England Power Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slonimsky v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API