Legal Opinion

Slonimsky v. City of Springfield

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 27, 1967No. 65 T 603; No. 65 T 603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

This is an action of tort under G. L. c. 84, § 15 to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff by reason of falling in the defendant city, upon a public sidewalk on which snow and ice had accumulated. The answer is a general denial; an allegation that the plaintiff’s accident was due to her own lack of due care; that the locus of the accident was not a part of the public way and a demand that the plaintiff prove that her injuries were received on a public way.

There was a finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,000.00. The defendant stipulated prior to trial that it would…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Naze v. Inhabitants of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Hughes v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Adams v. Inhabitants of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Harry E. Dillon, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API