Home Development Co. v. Arthur Jordan Land Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The appellee was the owner of some'vacant lots in the city of Indianapolis. The appellant was a contractor engaged in the erection of houses. The appellant was desirous of erecting houses upon appellee’s vacant lots and appellee desired to have them erected, expecting thereby to accelerate the sale of its lots. On March 18, 1926, for the purpose of accomplishing their mutual aims, appellant and appellee entered into a written contract. This action involves a determination of the respective rights of the parties under that contract.
Its terms insofar as it is necessary to set them out for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Lowe v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crowe v. Gary State BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Elliott v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Woods v. ParsonsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947