Lorick v. Palmetto Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Purdy, J., Richland, Fall Term, 1904. Action by Blanche O. Torick against Palmetto Bank and Trust Co; From1 judgment for defendant; plaintiff appeals. cites : Damages for malice may be given without claiming punitive damages: 5 Ency., 2 ed., 061; 114 Mass., 519; 32 Mich., 77; Bald. (U. S.), 138. Qualified refusal is equivalent to refusal: 5 Ency., 2 ed., 1059; 12 Rich., 518. Plaintiff is entitled to damages: 14 C. B., 595; 5 Ency., 2 eel., 1060; 2 Add.
Read the full summary
Before Purdy, J., Richland, Fall Term, 1904. Action by Blanche O. Torick against Palmetto Bank and Trust Co; From1 judgment for defendant; plaintiff appeals. cites : Damages for malice may be given without claiming punitive damages: 5 Ency., 2 ed., 061; 114 Mass., 519; 32 Mich., 77; Bald. (U. S.), 138. Qualified refusal is equivalent to refusal: 5 Ency., 2 ed., 1059; 12 Rich., 518. Plaintiff is entitled to damages: 14 C. B., 595; 5 Ency., 2 eel., 1060; 2 Add. Cont., sec. 820; 2 Mors, on Banks, sec. 458; Newm. Bank Dep. (N. C.), sec. 215; 3 Ency., 226; 12 Rich., 525. cite: Damages-stiff ered…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
This action was commenced on the 15th day of September, 1903. It came on for trial before Judge Purdy and a jury, on the 28th of November, 1904. Its object was the recovery of $1,000 damages. After hearing- the testimony and argument of counsel and the Circuit Judge’s charge, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. After judgment an appeal was taken to this Court.
The admitted facts are that the plaintiff on the 14th March, 1903, deposited with the defendant bank the sum of $313.75, to' be paid out on the check of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Siminoff v. Jas. H. Goodman & Co. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- First Nat. Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- MacRum v. Security Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- St. Charles Mercantile Co. v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.