Roeder v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintipp in error is hereinafter referred to as the company, and defendants in error as the commission and Hofman, respectively.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The facts are not in dispute. Hofman, while employed by the company, was injured in an accident arising’ out of and in the course of that employment. As a result thereof he was totally disabled from July 28 to December 6, 1933. He filed his claim with the commission and was awarded compensation at $5 per week. The company, claiming the rate should have been $1.67 per week took the cause to the district court which affirmed the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Lyttle v. State Compensation Insurance FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Avalanche Industries, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Avalanche Industries, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009