Legal Opinion

Roeder v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 17, 1935No. 13,739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintipp in error is hereinafter referred to as the company, and defendants in error as the commission and Hofman, respectively.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The facts are not in dispute. Hofman, while employed by the company, was injured in an accident arising’ out of and in the course of that employment. As a result thereof he was totally disabled from July 28 to December 6, 1933. He filed his claim with the commission and was awarded compensation at $5 per week. The company, claiming the rate should have been $1.67 per week took the cause to the district court which affirmed the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lyttle v. State Compensation Insurance FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Avalanche Industries, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Avalanche Industries, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API